One common mistake when using Claude for Teachers to do a Check for Understanding is:
"Give me 5 quiz questions."
The problem isn’t that Claude can’t create questions.
It’s that if you don’t first specify "what exactly students need to understand," the AI easily generates questions that seem complete but actually only test memory.
Today, learn just one method:
Before creating questions, clearly write "what students should be able to do + what counts as true understanding."
Step 1: Don’t just write the course topic
For example, today’s lesson is:
"Grade 5 fraction multiplication."
This is only a topic.
It doesn’t tell Claude:
What exactly the students should learn today.
So don’t just input:
"Generate 5 fraction multiplication questions for grade 5 students."
Think one step further.
Step 2: Change the goal to "what students should be able to do"
For example:
Students should be able to explain in their own words why 1/2 × 1/3 is smaller than 1/2.
Now the learning objective becomes observable.
Because what teachers really want to know is no longer just:
Whether students can find the answer.
But:
Whether they understand why multiplying by a number less than 1 can make the result smaller.
Step 3: Add "what counts as true understanding"
Next, add one more sentence:
If students can calculate correctly, explain the reason, and make the same judgment with different numbers, then it counts as true understanding.
Only now does Claude know:
It can’t just create three nearly identical calculation questions.
It needs to check different levels, such as:
Whether students can perform calculations.
Whether they can explain their reasoning.
Whether they can apply the judgment in different contexts.
Or even whether common misconceptions are revealed.
Finally, give the prompt to Claude
You can write the instruction as:
"Grade 5 math, today’s learning goal is: students should be able to explain why multiplying a fraction by another fraction less than 1 may result in a smaller number.
My criteria for true understanding are: correctly calculating, explaining the reason, and being able to judge correctly with different numbers.
Please create a short check for understanding with only 3 questions:
Question 1 checks basic operations.
Question 2 is designed to reveal common misunderstandings.
Question 3 asks students to explain their judgment in one sentence.
Finally, tell me what each question is assessing."
The key isn’t to copy this prompt exactly.
It’s to remember the two key elements before asking it:
What students should be able to do.
What performance counts as true understanding.
Why not just ask AI to create more questions directly?
Because "getting the right answer" and "understanding" are not the same.
Students might:
Memorize formulas.
Mimic example problems shown by the teacher.
Guess correctly on multiple-choice questions.
Or just recognize the question type and apply the corresponding steps.
They might get everything right but fail when asked in a different way.
So a check for understanding aims to reveal not just fractions,
but what students are really thinking.
This is also Anthropic’s approach to Check for Understanding: create brief, standards-aligned assessments that let teachers see students’ thinking and decide the next teaching step.
This new teaching skill currently supports math.
Remember today’s method in one minute
Next time you want AI to help with a check for understanding, don’t start with:
"Give me X number of questions."
Start by writing:
What should students be able to do?
Then write:
What evidence will convince me they truly understand?
Only then ask AI to generate questions.
This way, AI’s output won’t look like a random quiz,
but will be closer to what teachers really need:
Help you identify whether to continue teaching or pause to reinforce concepts.
Today, progress a little with AI.
Learn an AI skill every day.
Save a bit of time daily.
Improve a bit each day.
SasaDaily, growing together with you.
Recommended Reading
AI Quick Q&A | 2026/08/16: Does Getting a Retake Question Right Really Mean You’ve Learned It?
